On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:56:25AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > This series renames struct blk_keyslot_manager to struct > blk_crypto_profile, as it is misnamed; it doesn't always manage > keyslots. It's much more logical to think of it as the > "blk-crypto profile" of a device, similar to blk_integrity_profile. > > This series also improves the inline-encryption.rst documentation file, > and cleans up blk-crypto-fallback a bit. > > This series applies to v5.15-rc2. > > Changed v2 => v3: > - Made some minor tweaks to patches 3 and 4, mostly comments and > documentation. > - Clarified a commit message to mention no change in behavior. > - Added a Reviewed-by tag. > > Changed v1 => v2: > - Fixed a build error in blk-integrity.c. > - Removed a mention of "ksm" from a comment. > - Dropped the patch "blk-crypto-fallback: consolidate static variables". > - Added Acked-by and Reviewed-by tags. > > Eric Biggers (4): > blk-crypto-fallback: properly prefix function and struct names > blk-crypto: rename keyslot-manager files to blk-crypto-profile > blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile > blk-crypto: update inline encryption documentation Any more feedback on this? If there are any objections to the renaming of blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile, now is the time to speak up. - Eric -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
