On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 06:31:31PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and > structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback. Instead, use > "blk_crypto_fallback_". Some places already did this, but others > didn't. > > This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to > mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like). > Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot". > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> These names are pretty long, but given that there aren't all the many of them: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
