Re: [PATCH 4/9] libmultipath: use strbuf in dict.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 05:27:05PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Mi, 2021-07-28 at 14:03 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:52:18PM +0200, mwilck@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Temporary solution for snprint_keyword(), as print.c hasn't been
> > > migrated yet.
> > 
> > Mostly good. I have some minor issues with this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  libmultipath/dict.c    | 313 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > ----
> > >  libmultipath/dict.h    |  19 +--
> > >  libmultipath/parser.c  |  47 ++++---
> > >  libmultipath/parser.h  |  15 +-
> > >  libmultipath/propsel.c | 147 +++++++++----------
> > >  5 files changed, 253 insertions(+), 288 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > >  
> > > @@ -419,21 +381,18 @@ declare_ovr_snprint(selector, print_str)
> > >  declare_mp_handler(selector, set_str)
> > >  declare_mp_snprint(selector, print_str)
> > >  
> > > -static int snprint_uid_attrs(struct config *conf, char *buff, int
> > > len,
> > > +static int snprint_uid_attrs(struct config *conf, struct strbuf
> > > *buff,
> > >                              const void *dummy)
> > >  {
> > > -       char *p = buff;
> > > -       int n, j;
> > > +       int j, ret;
> > >         const char *att;
> > >  
> > >         vector_foreach_slot(&conf->uid_attrs, att, j) {
> > > -               n = snprintf(p, len, "%s%s", j == 0 ? "" : " ",
> > > att);
> > > -               if (n >= len)
> > > -                       return (p - buff) + n;
> > > -               p += n;
> > > -               len -= n;
> > > +               ret = print_strbuf(buff, "%s%s", j == 0 ? "" : " ",
> > > att);
> > > +               if (ret < 0)
> > > +                       return ret;
> > >         }
> > 
> > On success, this should return the amount of data written, instead of
> > like the other snprint_* functions, not 0.
> > 
> > > -       return p - buff;
> > > +       return 0;
> 
> Right, thanks!
> 
> 
> > > +snprint_ble_simple (struct config *conf, struct strbuf *buff,
> > > const void *data)
> > >  {
> > > -       const struct blentry * ble = (const struct blentry *)data;
> > > +       const struct blentry *ble = (const struct blentry *)data;
> > >  
> > > -       return snprintf(buff, len, "\"%s\"", ble->str);
> > 
> > We should probably quote the regexes when printing them, so either
> > append_strbuf_quoted() or, if you're worried about how that would
> > handle
> > interior quotes, print_strbud with "\"%s\"".
> > 
> > > +       return print_str(buff, ble->str);
> 
> print_str() already calls append_strbuf_quoted(). Am I overlooking
> something?

I'm not sure what I was thinking here.  This looks fine.

-Ben

> 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> 

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux