With the new block_device life time rules there is no way for the
bdev to go away as long as there is a holder, so remove these.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
block/holder.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/holder.c b/block/holder.c
index 904a1dcd5c12..960654a71342 100644
--- a/block/holder.c
+++ b/block/holder.c
@@ -92,11 +92,6 @@ int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
ret = add_symlink(bdev->bd_holder_dir, &disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj);
if (ret)
goto out_del;
- /*
- * bdev could be deleted beneath us which would implicitly destroy
- * the holder directory. Hold on to it.
- */
- kobject_get(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
list_add(&holder->list, &bdev->bd_holder_disks);
goto out_unlock;
@@ -130,7 +125,6 @@ void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(holder == NULL) && !--holder->refcnt) {
del_symlink(disk->slave_dir, bdev_kobj(bdev));
del_symlink(bdev->bd_holder_dir, &disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj);
- kobject_put(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
list_del_init(&holder->list);
kfree(holder);
}
--
2.30.2
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
