Sent from my iPhone
> On May 19, 2021, at 12:17 AM, Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 19/05/2021 04:56, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> +static inline unsigned int bio_zone_no(struct request_queue *q,
>> + struct bio *bio)
>> +{
>> + return blk_queue_zone_no(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int bio_zone_is_seq(struct request_queue *q,
>> + struct bio *bio)
>> +{
>> + return blk_queue_zone_is_seq(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Can't we derive the queue from the bio via bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue
> or would this be too much pointer chasing for a small helper like this?
We have made such code changes to get rid of separate argument q and derive it from bio for block trace cleanup. Unless there is a strong reason (such as q is not available in this call which I have not looked into), we should avoid passing q as separate argument.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
