Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] block: use per-task poll context to implement bio based io polling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:19:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Currently bio based IO polling needs to poll all hw queue blindly, this
> way is very inefficient, and one big reason is that we can't pass any
> bio submission result to blk_poll().
> 
> In IO submission context, track associated underlying bios by per-task
> submission queue and store returned 'cookie' in
> bio->bi_iter.bi_private_data, and return current->pid to caller of
> submit_bio() for any bio based driver's IO, which is submitted from FS.
> 
> In IO poll context, the passed cookie tells us the PID of submission
> context, then we can find bios from the per-task io pull context of
> submission context. Moving bios from submission queue to poll queue of
> the poll context, and keep polling until these bios are ended. Remove
> bio from poll queue if the bio is ended. Add bio flags of BIO_DONE and
> BIO_END_BY_POLL for such purpose.
> 
> In was found in Jeffle Xu's test that kfifo doesn't scale well for a
> submission queue as queue depth is increased, so a new mechanism for
> tracking bios is needed. So far bio's size is close to 2 cacheline size,
> and it may not be accepted to add new field into bio for solving the
> scalability issue by tracking bios via linked list, switch to bio group
> list for tracking bio, the idea is to reuse .bi_end_io for linking bios
> into a linked list for all sharing same .bi_end_io(call it bio group),
> which is recovered before ending bio really, since BIO_END_BY_POLL is
> added for enhancing this point. Usually .bi_end_bio is same for all
> bios in same layer, so it is enough to provide very limited groups, such
> as 16 or less for fixing the scalability issue.
> 
> Usually submission shares context with io poll. The per-task poll context
> is just like stack variable, and it is cheap to move data between the two
> per-task queues.
> 
> Also when the submission task is exiting, drain pending IOs in the context
> until all are done.
> 
> Tested-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/bio.c               |   5 +
>  block/blk-core.c          | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  block/blk-ioc.c           |   3 +
>  block/blk-mq.c            | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  block/blk.h               |  10 ++
>  include/linux/blk_types.h |  26 +++-
>  6 files changed, 439 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 26b7f721cda8..04c043dc60fc 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -1402,6 +1402,11 @@ static inline bool bio_remaining_done(struct bio *bio)
>   **/
>  void bio_endio(struct bio *bio)
>  {
> +	/* BIO_END_BY_POLL has to be set before calling submit_bio */
> +	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_END_BY_POLL)) {
> +		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_DONE);
> +		return;
> +	}

Why can't driver that implements bio based polling call a separate
bio_endio_polled instead?

> +static inline void *bio_grp_data(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	return bio->bi_poll;
> +}

What is the purpose of this helper?  And why does it have to lose the
type information?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux