Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] block: add bdev_interposer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The 03/16/2021 11:09, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 06:44:54PM +0300, Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> > bdev_interposer allows to redirect bio requests to another devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  block/bio.c               |  2 ++
> >  block/blk-core.c          | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  block/genhd.c             | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/blk_types.h |  3 +++
> >  include/linux/blkdev.h    |  9 +++++++
> >  5 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> > index a1c4d2900c7a..0bfbf06475ee 100644
> > --- a/block/bio.c
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -640,6 +640,8 @@ void __bio_clone_fast(struct bio *bio, struct bio *bio_src)
> >  		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
> >  	if (bio_flagged(bio_src, BIO_REMAPPED))
> >  		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_REMAPPED);
> > +	if (bio_flagged(bio_src, BIO_INTERPOSED))
> > +		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED);
> >  	bio->bi_opf = bio_src->bi_opf;
> >  	bio->bi_ioprio = bio_src->bi_ioprio;
> >  	bio->bi_write_hint = bio_src->bi_write_hint;
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index fc60ff208497..da1abc4c27a9 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -1018,6 +1018,55 @@ static blk_qc_t __submit_bio_noacct_mq(struct bio *bio)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static noinline blk_qc_t submit_bio_interposed(struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > +	blk_qc_t ret = BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> > +	struct bio_list bio_list[2] = { };
> > +	struct gendisk *orig_disk;
> > +
> > +	if (current->bio_list) {
> > +		bio_list_add(&current->bio_list[0], bio);
> > +		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	orig_disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk;
> > +	if (unlikely(bio_queue_enter(bio)))
> > +		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> > +
> > +	current->bio_list = bio_list;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		struct block_device *interposer = bio->bi_bdev->bd_interposer;
> > +
> > +		if (unlikely(!interposer)) {
> > +			/* interposer was removed */
> > +			bio_list_add(&current->bio_list[0], bio);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +		/* assign bio to interposer device */
> > +		bio_set_dev(bio, interposer);
> > +		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED);
> > +
> > +		if (!submit_bio_checks(bio))
> > +			break;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Because the current->bio_list is initialized,
> > +		 * the submit_bio callback will always return BLK_QC_T_NONE.
> > +		 */
> > +		interposer->bd_disk->fops->submit_bio(bio);
> 
> Given original request queue may become live when calling attach() and
> detach(), see below comment. bdev_interposer_detach() may be run
> when running ->submit_bio(), meantime the interposer device is
> gone during the period, then kernel oops.

I think that since the bio_queue_enter() function was called,
q->q_usage_counter will not allow the critical code in the attach/detach
functions to be executed, which is located between the blk_freeze_queue
and blk_unfreeze_queue calls.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

> 
> > +	} while (false);
> > +
> > +	current->bio_list = NULL;
> > +
> > +	blk_queue_exit(orig_disk->queue);
> > +
> > +	/* Resubmit remaining bios */
> > +	while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list[0])))
> > +		ret = submit_bio_noacct(bio);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * submit_bio_noacct - re-submit a bio to the block device layer for I/O
> >   * @bio:  The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
> > @@ -1029,6 +1078,14 @@ static blk_qc_t __submit_bio_noacct_mq(struct bio *bio)
> >   */
> >  blk_qc_t submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Checking the BIO_INTERPOSED flag is necessary so that the bio
> > +	 * created by the bdev_interposer do not get to it for processing.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (bdev_has_interposer(bio->bi_bdev) &&
> > +	    !bio_flagged(bio, BIO_INTERPOSED))
> > +		return submit_bio_interposed(bio);
> > +
> >  	if (!submit_bio_checks(bio))
> >  		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> >  
> > diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> > index c55e8f0fced1..c840ecffea68 100644
> > --- a/block/genhd.c
> > +++ b/block/genhd.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
> >  static struct kobject *block_depr;
> >  
> >  DECLARE_RWSEM(bdev_lookup_sem);
> > +/*
> > + * Prevents different block-layer interposers from attaching or detaching
> > + * to the block device at the same time.
> > + */
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(bdev_interposer_attach_lock);
> >  
> >  /* for extended dynamic devt allocation, currently only one major is used */
> >  #define NR_EXT_DEVT		(1 << MINORBITS)
> > @@ -1940,3 +1945,52 @@ static void disk_release_events(struct gendisk *disk)
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(disk->ev && disk->ev->block != 1);
> >  	kfree(disk->ev);
> >  }
> > +
> > +int bdev_interposer_attach(struct block_device *original,
> > +			   struct block_device *interposer)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(((!original) || (!interposer))))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * interposer should be simple, no a multi-queue device
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!interposer->bd_disk->fops->submit_bio)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!blk_mq_is_queue_frozen(original->bd_disk->queue)))
> > +		return -EPERM;
> 
> The original request queue may become live now...

Yes.
I will remove the blk_mq_is_queue_frozen() function and use a different
approach.

> 
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&bdev_interposer_attach_lock);
> > +
> > +	if (bdev_has_interposer(original))
> > +		ret = -EBUSY;
> > +	else {
> > +		original->bd_interposer = bdgrab(interposer);
> > +		if (!original->bd_interposer)
> > +			ret = -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	mutex_unlock(&bdev_interposer_attach_lock);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_interposer_attach);
> > +
> > +void bdev_interposer_detach(struct block_device *original)
> > +{
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!original))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!blk_mq_is_queue_frozen(original->bd_disk->queue)))
> > +		return;
> 
> The original request queue may become live now...
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ming
> 

-- 
Sergei Shtepa
Veeam Software developer.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux