On Thu, Mar 04 2021 at 10:01am -0500,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, Mikulas,
>
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, JeffleXu wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/3/21 3:05 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >>
> >> > Support I/O polling if submit_bio_noacct_mq_direct returned non-empty
> >> > cookie.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/md/dm.c | 5 +++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm.c
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm.c 2021-03-02 19:26:34.000000000 +0100
> >> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm.c 2021-03-02 19:26:34.000000000 +0100
> >> > @@ -1682,6 +1682,11 @@ static void __split_and_process_bio(stru
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > + if (ci.poll_cookie != BLK_QC_T_NONE) {
> >> > + while (atomic_read(&ci.io->io_count) > 1 &&
> >> > + blk_poll(ci.poll_queue, ci.poll_cookie, true)) ;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > /* drop the extra reference count */
> >> > dec_pending(ci.io, errno_to_blk_status(error));
> >> > }
> >>
> >> It seems that the general idea of your design is to
> >> 1) submit *one* split bio
> >> 2) blk_poll(), waiting the previously submitted split bio complets
> >
> > No, I submit all the bios and poll for the last one.
>
> What happens if the last bio completes first? It looks like you will
> call blk_poll with a cookie that already completed, and I'm pretty sure
> that's invalid.
In addition, I'm concerned this approach to have DM internalize IO
polling is a non-starter.
I just don't think this approach adheres to the io_uring + IO polling
interface.. it never returns a cookie to upper layers... so there is
really no opportunity for standard io_uring + IO polling interface to
work is there?
But Heinz and Mikulas are about to kick off some fio io_uring + hipri=1
(io polling) testing of Jeffle's latest v5 patchset:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/list/?series=442075
compared to Mikulas' patchset:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/list/?series=440719
We should have definitive answers soon enough, just using Jeffle's fio
config (with hipri=1 for IO polling) that was documented here:
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-October/msg00129.html
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
