On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 04:12:34PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 22:50 +0800, lixiaokeng wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > cli_add_path
> > > > ->ev_add_path
> > > > ->add_map_with_path
> > > > ->adopt_paths
> > > > ->pathinfo
> > > > ->filter_property
> > > > ->return PATHINFO_SKIPPED,
> > > > ->pp->mpp is NULL and not be set
> > > > ->return 0
> > >
> > > This returns 0, but add_map_with_path() has this code to check
> > > whether
> > > the path passed to it was actually added to the new map:
> > >
> > > if (adopt_paths(vecs->pathvec, mpp) ||
> > > find_slot(vecs->pathvec, pp) == -1)
> > > goto out; -> return NULL
> > >
> > > So ev_add_path() should have seen a NULL return from
> > > add_map_with_path(), should not have set start_waiter, and failed.
> > >
> >
> > I'm sorry for a big mistake in my stack. As the code is optimized,
> > pathinfo
> > return PATHINFO_SKIPPED after finish filter_property when I use gdb.
> > It
> > happens acctualy in:
> > 2141 if (pp->bus == SYSFS_BUS_SCSI &&
> > 2142 pp->sg_id.proto_id == SCSI_PROTOCOL_USB
> > &&
> > 2143 !conf->allow_usb_devices) {
> > 2144 condlog(3, "%s: skip USB device %s",
> > pp->dev,
> > 2145 pp->tgt_node_name);
> > 2146 return PATHINFO_SKIPPED;
> > 2147 }
> > 2148 }
> >
> > Stack:
> > cli_add_path
> > ->ev_add_path
> > ->add_map_with_path
> > ->adopt_paths
> > ->pathinfo
> > ->pp->bus == SYSFS_BUS_SCSI
> > ->return PATHINFO_SKIPPED,
> > ->pp->mpp is NULL and not be set
> > ->return 0
> > ->mpath_pr_event_handle
> > ->get_be64 //pp->mpp is dereference
> >
> > If you think my patch is ok, I will resend it.
>
> The same argument I made above still holds. "pp" wouldn't have been
> added to mpp, and add_map_with_path() would fail and return NULL.
> Also, if pathinfo() returns PATHINFO_SKIPPED for this device,
> how comes that cli_add_path() called ev_add_path() for it? It should
> have returned "blacklisted" instead.
So, I think the main issue here is that filter_property appears to be
broken. It only filters if uid_attribute is set, but that will never be
set the first time it's called in pathinfo. This means that it will
pass in the pathinfo call in cli_add_path, and the path will get stored
in the pathvec.
However, it will fail in the pathinfo call from adopt_paths, so the path
won't be added to the multipath device. This means adopt paths doesn't
actually adopt any paths potentially, but that in itself doesn't cause
it to fail. This check
if (adopt_paths(vecs->pathvec, mpp) ||
find_slot(vecs->pathvec, pp) == -1)
goto out;
passes, since we only check if the path is on the pathvec, not part of
the multipath device, and since filter_property let the path past the
first time, it is. So add_map_with_path() will create a multipath
device, but the path won't be added to it, and pp->mpp == NULL.
So, add_map_with_path() should probably check that we actually created a
map that included the path that got added. But more importantly,
filter_property shouldn't return different results the when it's called
the first time. That would have avoid the entire situation.
-Ben
> Your patch would only be effective if it was possible that
> add_map_with_path(vecs, pp, 1) returned an mpp != NULL, and at the same
> time pp->mpp was NULL; I still don't understand how that can come to
> pass.
>
> Have you tried my patch?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
