On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 18:03 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:09:33AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > Mike, do you need anything more to apply this one? Do you want a > > > cleaned-up resend? > > > > It got hung up with Christoph correctly requesting more discussion, > > last > > linux-block/lkml mail on the associated thread I kicked off is > > here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/23/76 > > > > Basically if Hannes or yourself would like to review that thread > > and > > send a relevant v2 it'd really help move this forward. I'm bogged > > down > > with too many competing tasks. You guys may be able to act on this > > line > > of development/fixing quicker than I'll get to it. > > I'll get back to this ASAP, sorry. AFAICS reverting 644bda6f3460, which is basically what Hannes did, is consensus. Christoph suggested also to revert the export of name_to_dev_t(), but that is used in a couple of other places too, unexporting it will require a bit more work. I'd like to move forward with the issue of blocking dm ioctls, so I'll submit a v2. Feel free to use or discard it as you please. Thanks, Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
