On 2021-01-15 4:54 a.m., Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 20:07 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
IMA measures files and buffer data such as keys, command-line arguments
passed to the kernel on kexec system call, etc. While these measurements
are necessary for monitoring and validating the integrity of the system,
they are not sufficient. Various data structures, policies, and states
stored in kernel memory also impact the integrity of the system.
Several kernel subsystems contain such integrity critical data -
e.g. LSMs like SELinux, AppArmor etc. or device-mapper targets like
dm-crypt, dm-verity, dm-integrity etc. These kernel subsystems help
protect the integrity of a system. Their integrity critical data is not
expected to change frequently during run-time. Some of these structures
cannot be defined as __ro_after_init, because they are initialized later.
For a given system, various external services/infrastructure tools
(including the attestation service) interact with it - both during the
setup and during rest of the system run-time. They share sensitive data
and/or execute critical workload on that system. The external services
may want to verify the current run-time state of the relevant kernel
subsystems before fully trusting the system with business critical
data/workload. For instance, verifying that SELinux is in "enforce" mode
along with the expected policy, disks are encrypted with a certain
configuration, secure boot is enabled etc.
This series provides the necessary IMA functionality for kernel
subsystems to ensure their configuration can be measured:
- by kernel subsystems themselves,
- in a tamper resistant way,
- and re-measured - triggered on state/configuration change.
This patch set:
- defines a new IMA hook ima_measure_critical_data() to measure
integrity critical data,
- limits the critical data being measured based on a label,
- defines a builtin critical data measurement policy,
- and includes an SELinux consumer of the new IMA critical data hook.
Thanks Tushar, Lakshmi. This patch set is queued in the next-
integrity-testing branch.
Mimi
Hello Mimi, Paul, Stephen, Tyler,
Thanks a lot for reviewing this series and providing all the valuable
feedback over the last few months.
We really really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Tushar
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
