On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 06:36:16 PST (-0800), snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22 2020 at 8:32am -0500,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 07:00:57PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I haven't gotten a whole lot of feedback, so I'm inclined to at least have some
> reasonable performance numbers before bothering with a v2.
FYI, my other main worry beside duplicating nbd is that device mapper
really is a stacked interface that sits on top of other block device.
Turning this into something else that just pipes data to userspace
seems very strange.
I agree. Only way I'd be interested is if it somehow tackled enabling
much more efficient IO. Earlier discussion in this thread mentioned
that zero-copy and low overhead wasn't a priority (because it is hard,
etc). But the hard work has already been done with io_uring. If
dm-user had a prereq of leaning heavily on io_uring and also enabled IO
polling for bio-based then there may be a win to supporting it.
But unless lower latency (or some other more significant win) is made
possible I just don't care to prop up an unnatural DM bolt-on.
I don't remember if I mentioned this in the thread, but it was definately in
the Plumbers talk, but I'd had the general idea bouncing around that it would
be possible to write a high-performance version of this using an interface
similar to the one provided here while relying on io_uring for the
high-performance userspace. That definately won't work with exactly the
current interface, but my hope was to avoid writing my own high-performance
ring buffer. My worry was that it'll be too tricky to map this all to
zero-copy, and I guess I forgot about it.
Now that you bring it up, it certainly seems worth taking a shot at. We'd
essentially have the best of both worlds: userspace implementations that want
to be simple could just use read()/write(), while those that want to be higher
performance could have their implicit ring buffer.
I'm currently trying to put together a benchmarking setup that is of sufficient
fidelity that I would believe the numbers, which is really why I don't have any
performance numbers yet (no sense posting numbers I would shoot down :)). I'll
try to remember to take a shot at an io_uring based userspace (probably with
some dm-user interface modifications) to see how it feels.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
