Re: split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:50:08 +0100
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@xxxxxxxxx>, Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201207131918.2252553-1-hch@lst.de>
References: <20201207131918.2252553-1-hch@lst.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Jens, can you pick this up for 5.11?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

References:
- split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid10"
Next by Date: [PATCH] dm: avoid filesystem lookup in dm_get_dev_t()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/3] dm ioctl: fix error return code in target_message
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux