On 12/2/20 1:03 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > What you've done here is fairly chaotic/disruptive: > 1) you emailed a patch out that isn't needed or ideal, I dealt already > staged a DM fix in linux-next for 5.10-rcX, see: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-5.10-rcX&id=f28de262ddf09b635095bdeaf0e07ff507b3c41b Then ti->type->io_hints() is still bypassed when type->iterate_devices() not defined? -- Thanks, Jeffle -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
