Re: [PATCH 17/20] filemap: consistently use ->f_mapping over ->i_mapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:13:16PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > @@ -2887,13 +2887,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_map_pages);
> >  vm_fault_t filemap_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> >  {
> >  	struct page *page = vmf->page;
> > -	struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> > +	struct inode *inode = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host;
> >  	vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
> >  
> >  	sb_start_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
> >  	file_update_time(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> >  	lock_page(page);
> > -	if (page->mapping != inode->i_mapping) {
> > +	if (page->mapping != vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping) {
> 
> Bit messy.  I'd do:
> 
> 	struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> 
> 	sb_start_pagefault(mapping->host->i_sb);
> 
> 	if (page->mapping != mapping)
> 
> 	sb_end_pagefault(mapping->host->i_sb);

Fine with me.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux