On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:23:51AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.11.2020 10:09, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:04:04AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 18.11.2020 09:58, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:56:11AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> since this isn't the first series from you recently spamming > >>>> xen-devel, may I ask that you don't Cc entire series to lists > >>>> which are involved with perhaps just one out of the many patches? > >>>> IMO Cc lists should be compiled on a per-patch basis; the cover > >>>> letter may of course be sent to the union of all of them. > >>> > >>> No way. Individual CCs are completely broken as they don't provide > >>> the reviewer a context. > >> > >> That's the view of some people, but not all. Context can be easily > >> established by those who care going to one of the many archives on > >> which the entire series lands. Getting spammed, however, can't be > >> avoided by the dozens or hundreds of list subscribers. > > > > kernel patches are never "spam", sorry, but for developers to try to > > determine which lists/maintainers want to see the whole series and which > > do not is impossible. > > > > Patches in a series are easily deleted from sane mail clients with a > > single click/keystroke all at once, they aren't a problem that needs to > > be reduced in volume. > > This doesn't scale, neither in the dimension of recipients nor in > the dimension of possible sources of such series. > > While it may seem small, it's also a waste of resources to have mails > sent to hundreds of even thousands of people. So while from a > technical content perspective I surely agree with you saying 'kernel > patches are never "spam"', they still are from the perspective of > what "spam mail" originally means: Mail the recipients did not want > to receive. What doesn't scale is developers who only care about their tiny sliver of Linux and don't stick their heads up from time to time and look around. This is an opportunity for people to become more involved in the development of Linux as a whole, instead of just worrying about their bit. You're not "a Xen developer". You're a Linux developer whose current focus is on Xen. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
