Now that all drivers that want to hook into setting or clearing the
read-only flag use the set_read_only method, this code can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
block/ioctl.c | 23 -----------------------
1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
index a6fa16b9770593..96cb4544736468 100644
--- a/block/ioctl.c
+++ b/block/ioctl.c
@@ -346,26 +346,6 @@ static int blkdev_pr_clear(struct block_device *bdev,
return ops->pr_clear(bdev, c.key);
}
-/*
- * Is it an unrecognized ioctl? The correct returns are either
- * ENOTTY (final) or ENOIOCTLCMD ("I don't know this one, try a
- * fallback"). ENOIOCTLCMD gets turned into ENOTTY by the ioctl
- * code before returning.
- *
- * Confused drivers sometimes return EINVAL, which is wrong. It
- * means "I understood the ioctl command, but the parameters to
- * it were wrong".
- *
- * We should aim to just fix the broken drivers, the EINVAL case
- * should go away.
- */
-static inline int is_unrecognized_ioctl(int ret)
-{
- return ret == -EINVAL ||
- ret == -ENOTTY ||
- ret == -ENOIOCTLCMD;
-}
-
static int blkdev_flushbuf(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
@@ -384,9 +364,6 @@ static int blkdev_roset(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
- ret = __blkdev_driver_ioctl(bdev, mode, cmd, arg);
- if (!is_unrecognized_ioctl(ret))
- return ret;
if (get_user(n, (int __user *)arg))
return -EFAULT;
if (bdev->bd_disk->fops->set_read_only) {
--
2.29.2
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
