Re: Thoughts about multipathd's log thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 09:27:13AM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 16:40 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > 
> > I do believe that syslog is allowed to block the caller, but I agree
> > that we've mostly moved on to a systemd world where multipathd is
> > writing to stderr. Removing this will make multipathd run a real risk
> > of
> > hanging on logging when not run through systemd. I just don't know
> > how
> > likely that scenario is anymore.
> 
> So, you really think that journald is doing a better job at not
> blocking clients than syslogd? Wouldn't syslogd be truly optimized for
> exactly this use case? Being "allowed" to block clients is one thing,
> actually doing it is another.

Fair enough. It probably is coming down to a difference in honesty in
documentation. At any rate, I have never seen a bug that pointed towards
multipathd hanging on logging.

-Ben

> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux