On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 18:33 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > I have one nitpick. This code looks like it's pretending to allocate > pages of memory, when it's not. Malloc's bookeeping space means that > this memory chunk will be larger than a page. Even if it was page > sized, > unless userspace is specifically asking for page-aligned memory, it > most > like won't get it. Since AFAIK there is no benefit to mallocing > memory > in a specific size increment, it doesn't seem woirth adding any > complexity to make sure our mallocs do that. I agree about the bookkeeping space, and about the "pretending", too. This was not about alignment. It's just a habit to use powers of 2 for array sizes. The point of increasing the memory area in chunks was simply to call realloc() less often. I believe that's a good thing. I plan to do this for our vector implementation, too, some day. Thanks, Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
