Re: [PATCH v2] dm: Call proper helper to determine dax support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 21-09-20 11:23:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 11:18, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > DM was calling generic_fsdax_supported() to determine whether a device
> > referenced in the DM table supports DAX. However this is a helper for "leaf" device drivers so that
> > they don't have to duplicate common generic checks. High level code
> > should call dax_supported() helper which that calls into appropriate
> > helper for the particular device. This problem manifested itself as
> > kernel messages:
> >
> > dm-3: error: dax access failed (-95)
> >
> > when lvm2-testsuite run in cases where a DM device was stacked on top of
> > another DM device.
> >
> > Fixes: 7bf7eac8d648 ("dax: Arrange for dax_supported check to span multiple devices")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1 [1]:
> > - Add missing dax_read_lock() around dax_supported()
> >
> > [1]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916151445.450-1-jack@xxxxxxx
> >
> >  drivers/dax/super.c   |    4 ++++
> >  drivers/md/dm-table.c |   10 +++++++---
> >  include/linux/dax.h   |   11 +++++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
> > index e5767c83ea23..b6284c5cae0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dax/super.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
> > @@ -325,11 +325,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_direct_access);
> >  bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev, struct block_device *bdev,
> >                 int blocksize, sector_t start, sector_t len)
> >  {
> > +       if (!dax_dev)
> > +               return false;
> > +
> >         if (!dax_alive(dax_dev))
> >                 return false;
> >
> >         return dax_dev->ops->dax_supported(dax_dev, bdev, blocksize, start, len);
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_supported);
> 
> arm build error while building with allmodconfig.
> 
> ../drivers/dax/super.c:325:6: error: redefinition of ‘dax_supported’
>   325 | bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev, struct
> block_device *bdev,
>       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ../drivers/dax/super.c:16:
> ../include/linux/dax.h:162:20: note: previous definition of
> ‘dax_supported’ was here
>   162 | static inline bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
>       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:283: drivers/dax/super.o] Error 1
> 
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Ref:
> https://builds.tuxbuild.com/IO690jFQDp0qP9zFuWBqpA/build.log

Thanks for report! Attached patch should fix the build (at least I've
tested it with CONFIG_DAX && CONFIG_FS_DAX, CONFIG_DAX && !CONFIG_FS_DAX,
and !CONFIG_DAX cases). Dan can you please merge the fix?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
>From c48c9d1ee41ca17561dfd7ec5247b5afc527d40e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:33:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dax: Fix compilation for CONFIG_DAX && !CONFIG_FS_DAX

dax_supported() is defined whenever CONFIG_DAX is enabled. So dummy
implementation should be defined only in !CONFIG_DAX case, not in
!CONFIG_FS_DAX case.

Fixes: e2ec51282545 ("dm: Call proper helper to determine dax support")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/dax.h | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
index 497031392e0a..43b39ab9de1a 100644
--- a/include/linux/dax.h
+++ b/include/linux/dax.h
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static inline void set_dax_synchronous(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
 {
 	__set_dax_synchronous(dax_dev);
 }
+bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev, struct block_device *bdev,
+		int blocksize, sector_t start, sector_t len);
 /*
  * Check if given mapping is supported by the file / underlying device.
  */
@@ -104,6 +106,12 @@ static inline bool dax_synchronous(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
 static inline void set_dax_synchronous(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
 {
 }
+static inline bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
+		struct block_device *bdev, int blocksize, sector_t start,
+		sector_t len)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 static inline bool daxdev_mapping_supported(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				struct dax_device *dax_dev)
 {
@@ -130,8 +138,6 @@ static inline bool generic_fsdax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
 	return __generic_fsdax_supported(dax_dev, bdev, blocksize, start,
 			sectors);
 }
-bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev, struct block_device *bdev,
-		int blocksize, sector_t start, sector_t len);
 
 static inline void fs_put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
 {
@@ -159,13 +165,6 @@ static inline bool generic_fsdax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool dax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
-		struct block_device *bdev, int blocksize, sector_t start,
-		sector_t len)
-{
-	return false;
-}
-
 static inline void fs_put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
 {
 }
-- 
2.16.4

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux