On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:35:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> > index 81722cdcf0cb21..95eb35324e1a61 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> > @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ queue_max_sectors_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count)
> >
> > spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> > q->limits.max_sectors = max_sectors_kb << 1;
> > - q->backing_dev_info->io_pages = max_sectors_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> > spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
>
> So do I get it right that readahead won't now be limited if you store lower
> value to max_sectors? Why? I'd consider io_pages a "cached value" of
> max_sectors and thus expect it to change together with max_sectors...
Most to start untangling the bdi from the queue. But I had to peddle
back on that in the follow on series anyway, so I can add this back.
> > @@ -812,7 +813,7 @@ static void __device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
> > disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_SUPPRESS_PARTITION_INFO;
> > disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
> > } else {
> > - struct backing_dev_info *bdi = disk->queue->backing_dev_info;
> > + struct backing_dev_info *bdi = q->backing_dev_info;
> > struct device *dev = disk_to_dev(disk);
> > int ret;
>
> Not sure how/why these changes got here... Not that I care too much :)
Because more changes in this area in earlier versions of the patches.
But yes, this shouldn't be here, so I'll drop it.
> > @@ -407,7 +406,6 @@ aoeblk_gdalloc(void *vp)
> > WARN_ON(d->gd);
> > WARN_ON(d->flags & DEVFL_UP);
> > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
> > - q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages = READ_AHEAD / PAGE_SIZE;
> > d->bufpool = mp;
> > d->blkq = gd->queue = q;
> > q->queuedata = d;
>
> Shouldn't AOE set 2MB optimal IO size so that readahead is equivalent to
> previous behavior?
Sure, I'll add a separate patch just for that.
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> > index 1bbdc410ee3c51..ff2101d56cd7f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> > @@ -1427,10 +1427,6 @@ static int cached_dev_init(struct cached_dev *dc, unsigned int block_size)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - dc->disk.disk->queue->backing_dev_info->ra_pages =
> > - max(dc->disk.disk->queue->backing_dev_info->ra_pages,
> > - q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages);
> > -
>
> So bcache is basically stacking readahead here on top of underlying cache
> device. I don't see this being replicated by your patch so it is lost now?
> Probably this should be replaced by properly inheriting optimal IO size?
Yes, I'll add another patch.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
