Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dm: unconditionally call blk_queue_split() in dm_process_bio()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 09:28:14PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at  9:08pm -0400,
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > blk_queue_split() has become compulsory from .submit_bio -- regardless
> > > of whether it is recursing.  Update DM core to always call
> > > blk_queue_split().
> > > 
> > > dm_queue_split() is removed because __split_and_process_bio() handles
> > > splitting as needed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/md/dm.c | 45 +--------------------------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > > index fb0255d25e4b..0bae9f26dc8e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > > @@ -1530,22 +1530,6 @@ static int __send_write_zeroes(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti)
> > >  	return __send_changing_extent_only(ci, ti, get_num_write_zeroes_bios(ti));
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static bool is_abnormal_io(struct bio *bio)
> > > -{
> > > -	bool r = false;
> > > -
> > > -	switch (bio_op(bio)) {
> > > -	case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> > > -	case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
> > > -	case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
> > > -	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> > > -		r = true;
> > > -		break;
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > > -	return r;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static bool __process_abnormal_io(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti,
> > >  				  int *result)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1723,23 +1707,6 @@ static blk_qc_t __process_bio(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *map,
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static void dm_queue_split(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_target *ti, struct bio **bio)
> > > -{
> > > -	unsigned len, sector_count;
> > > -
> > > -	sector_count = bio_sectors(*bio);
> > > -	len = min_t(sector_t, max_io_len((*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector, ti), sector_count);
> > > -
> > > -	if (sector_count > len) {
> > > -		struct bio *split = bio_split(*bio, len, GFP_NOIO, &md->queue->bio_split);
> > > -
> > > -		bio_chain(split, *bio);
> > > -		trace_block_split(md->queue, split, (*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> > > -		submit_bio_noacct(*bio);
> > > -		*bio = split;
> > > -	}
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
> > >  			       struct dm_table *map, struct bio *bio)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1759,17 +1726,7 @@ static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	/*
> > > -	 * If in ->queue_bio we need to use blk_queue_split(), otherwise
> > > -	 * queue_limits for abnormal requests (e.g. discard, writesame, etc)
> > > -	 * won't be imposed.
> > > -	 */
> > > -	if (current->bio_list) {
> > > -		if (is_abnormal_io(bio))
> > > -			blk_queue_split(&bio);
> > > -		else
> > > -			dm_queue_split(md, ti, &bio);
> > > -	}
> > > +	blk_queue_split(&bio);
> > 
> > In max_io_len(), target boundary is taken into account when figuring out
> > the max io len. However, this info won't be used any more after
> > switching to blk_queue_split(). Is that one potential problem?
> 
> Thanks for your review.  But no, as the patch header says:
> "dm_queue_split() is removed because __split_and_process_bio() handles
> splitting as needed."
> 
> (__split_and_process_non_flush calls max_io_len, as does
> __process_abnormal_io by calling __send_changing_extent_only)
> 
> SO the blk_queue_split() bio will be further split if needed (due to
> DM target boundary, etc).

Thanks for your explanation.

Then looks there is double split issue since both blk_queue_split()
and __split_and_process_non_flush() may split bio from same bioset(md->queue->bio_split),
and this way may cause deadlock, see comment of bio_alloc_bioset(), especially
the paragraph of 'callers must never allocate more than 1 bio at a time
from this pool.'


Thanks,
Ming

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux