On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 05:53:38PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> It is possible for a block device to use a non power-of-2 for chunk
> size which results in a full-stripe size that is also a non
> power-of-2.
>
> Update blk_queue_chunk_sectors() and blk_max_size_offset() to
> accommodate drivers that need a non power-of-2 chunk_sectors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/blk-settings.c | 10 ++++------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 +++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index b09642d5f15e..e40a162cc946 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -172,15 +172,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_hw_sectors);
> *
> * Description:
> * If a driver doesn't want IOs to cross a given chunk size, it can set
> - * this limit and prevent merging across chunks. Note that the chunk size
> - * must currently be a power-of-2 in sectors. Also note that the block
> - * layer must accept a page worth of data at any offset. So if the
> - * crossing of chunks is a hard limitation in the driver, it must still be
> - * prepared to split single page bios.
> + * this limit and prevent merging across chunks. Note that the block layer
> + * must accept a page worth of data at any offset. So if the crossing of
> + * chunks is a hard limitation in the driver, it must still be prepared
> + * to split single page bios.
> **/
> void blk_queue_chunk_sectors(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int chunk_sectors)
> {
> - BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(chunk_sectors));
> q->limits.chunk_sectors = chunk_sectors;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_chunk_sectors);
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 453a3d735d66..e72bcce22143 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -1059,11 +1059,17 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
> static inline unsigned int blk_max_size_offset(struct request_queue *q,
> sector_t offset)
> {
> - if (!q->limits.chunk_sectors)
> + unsigned int chunk_sectors = q->limits.chunk_sectors;
> +
> + if (!chunk_sectors)
> return q->limits.max_sectors;
>
> - return min(q->limits.max_sectors, (unsigned int)(q->limits.chunk_sectors -
> - (offset & (q->limits.chunk_sectors - 1))));
> + if (is_power_of_2(chunk_sectors))
> + chunk_sectors -= (offset & (chunk_sectors - 1));
> + else
> + chunk_sectors -= sector_div(offset, chunk_sectors);
> +
> + return min(q->limits.max_sectors, chunk_sectors);
> }
>
> static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq,
> --
> 2.15.0
>
is_power_of_2() is cheap enough for fast path, so looks fine to support
non-power-of-2 chunk sectors.
Maybe NVMe PCI can remove the power_of_2() limit too.
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Ming
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
