From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> Add a comment explaining why we use different flags for "new" and existing paths. Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> --- libmultipath/discovery.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/libmultipath/discovery.c b/libmultipath/discovery.c index 5f4ebf0..64d3473 100644 --- a/libmultipath/discovery.c +++ b/libmultipath/discovery.c @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ path_discover (vector pathvec, struct config * conf, udevice, flag | DI_BLACKLIST, NULL); else + /* + * Don't use DI_BLACKLIST on paths already in pathvec. We rely + * on the caller to pre-populate the pathvec with valid paths + * only. + */ return pathinfo(pp, conf, flag); } -- 2.28.0 -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
