On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mimi Zohar wrote: > If block layer integrity was enough, there wouldn't have been a need > for fs-verity. Even fs-verity is limited to read only filesystems, > which makes validating file integrity so much easier. From the > beginning, we've said that fs-verity signatures should be included in > the measurement list. (I thought someone signed on to add that support > to IMA, but have not yet seen anything.) > > Going forward I see a lot of what we've accomplished being incorporated > into the filesystems. When IMA will be limited to defining a system > wide policy, I'll have completed my job. What are your thoughts on IPE being a standalone LSM? Would you prefer to see its functionality integrated into IMA? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
