Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: Add memalloc_nowait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 29-06-20 13:18:16, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:08:51AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > @@ -886,8 +868,12 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__alloc_buffer_wait_no_callback(struct dm_bufio_client
> > >  			return NULL;
> > >  
> > >  		if (dm_bufio_cache_size_latch != 1 && !tried_noio_alloc) {
> > > +			unsigned noio_flag;
> > > +
> > >  			dm_bufio_unlock(c);
> > > -			b = alloc_buffer(c, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > > +			noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> > 
> > I've read the series twice and I'm still missing the definition of
> > memalloc_noio_save().
> > 
> > And also it would be nice to have a paragraph about it in
> > Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
> 
> Documentation/core-api/gfp_mask-from-fs-io.rst:``memalloc_nofs_save``, ``memalloc_nofs_restore`` respectively ``memalloc_noio_save``,
> Documentation/core-api/gfp_mask-from-fs-io.rst:   :functions: memalloc_noio_save memalloc_noio_restore
> Documentation/core-api/gfp_mask-from-fs-io.rst:allows nesting so it is safe to call ``memalloc_noio_save`` or
 
The patch is adding memalloc_nowait* and I suspect Mike had that in
mind, which would be a fair request. Btw. we are missing memalloc_nocma*
documentation either - I was just reminded of its existence today...

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux