On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:16:33PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > +/* > > + * Pass these flags down through the crypto API. > > + */ > > +#define CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS (CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC | CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY) > > This comment is useless. How about: > > /* > * When an algorithm uses another algorithm (e.g., if it's an instance of a > * template), these are the flags that always get set on the "outer" algorithm > * if any "inner" algorithm has them set. In some cases other flags are > * inherited too; these are just the flags that are *always* inherited. > */ > #define CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS (CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC | CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY) > > Also I wonder about the case where the inner algorithm is a fallback rather than > part of a template instance. This patch only handles templates, not fallbacks. > Is that intentional? Isn't that technically a bug? I'm not an expert in crypto internals, so I don't know. I'll send version 3 of this patch and I'd like to ask you or Herbert to fix it. > > + > > +/* > > * Transform masks and values (for crt_flags). > > */ > > #define CRYPTO_TFM_NEED_KEY 0x00000001 > > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/authenc.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/authenc.c 2020-06-26 17:24:03.566417000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/authenc.c 2020-06-26 17:24:03.566417000 +0200 > > @@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ static int crypto_authenc_create(struct > > if ((algt->type ^ CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_AEAD) & algt->mask) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - mask = crypto_requires_sync(algt->type, algt->mask); > > + mask = crypto_requires_sync(algt->type, algt->mask) | > > + crypto_requires_nomem(algt->type, algt->mask); > > As I suggested earlier, shouldn't there be a function that returns the mask for > all inherited flags, rather than handling each flag individually? Yes - I've created crypto_requires_inherited for this purpose. > > > > inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!inst) > > @@ -424,7 +425,7 @@ static int crypto_authenc_create(struct > > goto err_free_inst; > > > > inst->alg.base.cra_flags = (auth_base->cra_flags | > > - enc->base.cra_flags) & CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC; > > + enc->base.cra_flags) & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS; > > Strange indentation here. Likewise in most of the other files. I was told that the code should be 80-characters wide. > > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/xts.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/xts.c 2020-06-26 17:24:03.566417000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/xts.c 2020-06-26 17:24:03.566417000 +0200 > > @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static int create(struct crypto_template > > } else > > goto err_free_inst; > > > > - inst->alg.base.cra_flags = alg->base.cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC; > > + inst->alg.base.cra_flags = alg->base.cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS; > > inst->alg.base.cra_priority = alg->base.cra_priority; > > inst->alg.base.cra_blocksize = XTS_BLOCK_SIZE; > > inst->alg.base.cra_alignmask = alg->base.cra_alignmask | > > Need to set the mask correctly in this file. I don't know what do you mean. > > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/adiantum.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/adiantum.c 2020-06-26 17:24:03.566417000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/adiantum.c 2020-06-26 17:24:03.566417000 +0200 > > @@ -507,7 +507,8 @@ static int adiantum_create(struct crypto > > if ((algt->type ^ CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_SKCIPHER) & algt->mask) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - mask = crypto_requires_sync(algt->type, algt->mask); > > + mask = crypto_requires_sync(algt->type, algt->mask) | > > + crypto_requires_nomem(algt->type, algt->mask); > > > > inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ictx), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!inst) > > Need to use CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS in this file. OK. > - Eric Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
