Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > OK, that concall's issue had nothing to do with needing higher > resolution time (was about IOPs realized with requested-based vs > bio-based). > > Reality is, DM won't need anything higher resolution than jiffies until > block core's interfaces require something other than jiffies > (e.g. generic_end_io_acct). > > So feel free to proceed with the conditional time fetch solution you > were going to run with (prior to my previous mail asking you to hold > off). > > Sorry for the noise. Thanks, > Mike No problem, thanks for the information. I get started on it. -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
