On 2020/04/09 15:45, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Replace the 'target' pointer in the bio context with the
> device pointer as this is what's actually used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
> index fa297348f0bb..1ee10789f04d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> * Zone BIO context.
> */
> struct dmz_bioctx {
> - struct dmz_target *target;
> + struct dmz_dev *dev;
> struct dm_zone *zone;
> struct bio *bio;
> refcount_t ref;
> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ struct dmz_target {
> */
> #define DMZ_FLUSH_PERIOD (10 * HZ)
>
> +struct dmz_dev *dmz_sect_to_dev(struct dmz_target *dmz, sector_t sect)
> +{
> + return &dmz->dev[0];
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Target BIO completion.
> */
> @@ -81,7 +86,7 @@ static inline void dmz_bio_endio(struct bio *bio, blk_status_t status)
> if (status != BLK_STS_OK && bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK)
> bio->bi_status = status;
> if (bio->bi_status != BLK_STS_OK)
> - bioctx->target->dev->flags |= DMZ_CHECK_BDEV;
> + bioctx->dev->flags |= DMZ_CHECK_BDEV;
>
> if (refcount_dec_and_test(&bioctx->ref)) {
> struct dm_zone *zone = bioctx->zone;
> @@ -118,14 +123,20 @@ static int dmz_submit_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
> struct bio *bio, sector_t chunk_block,
> unsigned int nr_blocks)
> {
> - struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx = dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
> + struct dmz_dev *dev = dmz_zone_to_dev(dmz->metadata, zone);
> + struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx =
> + dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
> struct bio *clone;
>
> + if (dev->flags & DMZ_BDEV_DYING)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> clone = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, &dmz->bio_set);
> if (!clone)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - bio_set_dev(clone, dmz->dev->bdev);
> + bio_set_dev(clone, dev->bdev);
> + bioctx->dev = dev;
> clone->bi_iter.bi_sector =
> dmz_start_sect(dmz->metadata, zone) + dmz_blk2sect(chunk_block);
> clone->bi_iter.bi_size = dmz_blk2sect(nr_blocks) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> @@ -218,8 +229,10 @@ static int dmz_handle_read(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
>
> if (nr_blocks) {
> /* Valid blocks found: read them */
> - nr_blocks = min_t(unsigned int, nr_blocks, end_block - chunk_block);
> - ret = dmz_submit_bio(dmz, rzone, bio, chunk_block, nr_blocks);
> + nr_blocks = min_t(unsigned int, nr_blocks,
> + end_block - chunk_block);
> + ret = dmz_submit_bio(dmz, rzone, bio,
> + chunk_block, nr_blocks);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> chunk_block += nr_blocks;
> @@ -330,14 +343,16 @@ static int dmz_handle_write(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
> * and the BIO is aligned to the zone write pointer:
> * direct write the zone.
> */
> - return dmz_handle_direct_write(dmz, zone, bio, chunk_block, nr_blocks);
> + return dmz_handle_direct_write(dmz, zone, bio,
> + chunk_block, nr_blocks);
> }
>
> /*
> * This is an unaligned write in a sequential zone:
> * use buffered write.
> */
> - return dmz_handle_buffered_write(dmz, zone, bio, chunk_block, nr_blocks);
> + return dmz_handle_buffered_write(dmz, zone, bio,
> + chunk_block, nr_blocks);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -383,7 +398,6 @@ static int dmz_handle_discard(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
> static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
> struct bio *bio)
> {
> - struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx = dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
> struct dmz_metadata *zmd = dmz->metadata;
> struct dm_zone *zone;
> int ret;
> @@ -397,11 +411,6 @@ static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
>
> dmz_lock_metadata(zmd);
>
> - if (dmz->dev->flags & DMZ_BDEV_DYING) {
> - ret = -EIO;
> - goto out;
> - }
Are you removing this because you added the check to dmz_submit_bio() ?
> -
> /*
> * Get the data zone mapping the chunk. There may be no
> * mapping for read and discard. If a mapping is obtained,
> @@ -415,10 +424,8 @@ static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
> }
>
> /* Process the BIO */
> - if (zone) {
> + if (zone)
> dmz_activate_zone(zone);
> - bioctx->zone = zone;
Why are you removing this ? This is used in dmz_bio_endio()...
> - }
>
> switch (bio_op(bio)) {
> case REQ_OP_READ:
> @@ -625,14 +632,14 @@ static int dmz_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct dmz_target *dmz = ti->private;
> struct dmz_metadata *zmd = dmz->metadata;
> - struct dmz_dev *dev = dmz->dev;
> struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx = dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
> sector_t sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> unsigned int nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
> + struct dmz_dev *dev = dmz_sect_to_dev(dmz, sector);
> sector_t chunk_sector;
> int ret;
>
> - if (dmz_bdev_is_dying(dmz->dev))
> + if (dmz_bdev_is_dying(dev))
> return DM_MAPIO_KILL;
>
> dmz_dev_debug(dev, "BIO op %d sector %llu + %u => chunk %llu, block %llu, %u blocks",
> @@ -651,7 +658,7 @@ static int dmz_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> return DM_MAPIO_KILL;
>
> /* Initialize the BIO context */
> - bioctx->target = dmz;
> + bioctx->dev = NULL;
> bioctx->zone = NULL;
> bioctx->bio = bio;
> refcount_set(&bioctx->ref, 1);
> @@ -673,7 +680,7 @@ static int dmz_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
> /* Now ready to handle this BIO */
> ret = dmz_queue_chunk_work(dmz, bio);
> if (ret) {
> - dmz_dev_debug(dmz->dev,
> + dmz_dev_debug(dev,
> "BIO op %d, can't process chunk %llu, err %i\n",
> bio_op(bio), (u64)dmz_bio_chunk(zmd, bio),
> ret);
> @@ -930,11 +937,12 @@ static void dmz_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
> static int dmz_prepare_ioctl(struct dm_target *ti, struct block_device **bdev)
> {
> struct dmz_target *dmz = ti->private;
> + struct dmz_dev *dev = dmz_sect_to_dev(dmz, 0);
>
> - if (!dmz_check_bdev(dmz->dev))
> + if (!dmz_check_bdev(dev))
> return -EIO;
>
> - *bdev = dmz->dev->bdev;
> + *bdev = dev->bdev;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
