Re: [PATCH 4/4] dm-zoned: allow for device size smaller than the capacity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/31/20 2:49 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 2020/03/27 16:15, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
dm-zoned requires several zones for metadata and chunk bitmaps,
so it cannot expose the entire capacity as the device size.
Originally the code would check for the capacity being equal to
the device size, which is arguably wrong.
So relax this check and increase the interface version number
to signal to userspace that it can set a smaller device size.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
index 7ec9dde24516..89a825d1034e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int dmz_get_zoned_device(struct dm_target *ti, char *path)
  	aligned_capacity = dev->capacity &
  				~((sector_t)blk_queue_zone_sectors(q) - 1);
  	if (ti->begin ||
-	    ((ti->len != dev->capacity) && (ti->len != aligned_capacity))) {
+	    ((ti->len > dev->capacity) && (ti->len > aligned_capacity))) {
  		ti->error = "Partial mapping not supported";

The message is now wrong. Also, the condition can now be simplified to:

if ((ti->begin + ti->len) > aligned_capacity) {

Since aligned capacity is equal or smaller than dev capacity. And we have to
account for the potential non-zero begin.

_Actually_ I would forbid for 'ti->begin' to be anything other than 0.
For a zoned device there is no point in allowing for partial handling at all. Problem is that 'dev->capacity' is the capacity of the zoned block device, whereas 'ti-len' is the exported capacity of the device-mapper device, which is smaller than the device capacity by the number of metadata blocks/zones.

  		ret = -EINVAL;
  		goto err;
@@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ static int dmz_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv,
static struct target_type dmz_type = {
  	.name		 = "zoned",
-	.version	 = {1, 2, 0},
+	.version	 = {1, 3, 0},
  	.features	 = DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_ZONED_HM,
  	.module		 = THIS_MODULE,
  	.ctr		 = dmz_ctr,


I do not think this is nearly enough: dmz_init_zones() is still considering the
entire drive and does a zone report from 0 on the backend bdev. It should start
at ti->begin and up to ti->begin+ti->len, no ?

Yes, and no. I want to disallow 'ti->begin' to be anything else than 0 as ti->begin and ti->len are relative to exported device-mapper device, and we always want to have block 0 mapped :-)

And as such dmz_init_zones() needs to cover all zones, as this is relative to the zoned block device.

Furthermore, this introduce a change in the meaning of the zone ID. Since this
is set to the index of the zone in the report (patch 1), if the mapping is
partial and the zone report does not start at 0, then zone ID is not zone number
on the device anymore. So dmz_start_block() needs to be offset by ti->begin
otherwise IOs will go to the wrong zones.

As I said: We will never do a partial mapping.
What this patch does it to bring the device-mapper mapping in-line with the exported device size.

Originally we would export a device-mapper mapping for blocks up to the zone-device capacity. As the resulting device-mapper block device has a smaller capacity than the mapping would allow for those 'spare' blocks would never been used, thus the invalid mapping was never triggered.

What this patch does is to bring the device-mapper mapping in-line with the exported block device capacity, so that we don't have an invalid mapping. Nothing else has (and should) be changed.

Especially not the partial zoned device handling :-)

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux