Re: dm verity fec: Fix memory leak in verity_fec_ctr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 18 2020 at 11:44am -0400,
Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Once we are on this, we should put conditionals on those
> mempool_exit and kmem_cache_destroy
> calls in the fec dtr, because the target calls that destructor at
> any time on its error path thus part
> of the pools or even the cache won't be defined.

Please don't top-post.
kmem_cache_destroy() has a negative check for NULL, so no worries there.

> On 3/17/20 10:15 AM, Shetty, Harshini X (EXT-Sony Mobile) wrote:
> >Fix below kmemleak detected in verity_fec_ctr.
> >output_pool is allocated for each dm-target device.
> >But it is not freed when dm-table for the target
> >is removed.Hence Free the output buffer in destructor
> >function verity_fec_dtr
> >
> >unreferenced object 0xffffffffa574d000 (size 4096):
> >   comm "init", pid 1667, jiffies 4294894890 (age 307.168s)
> >   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >     8e 36 00 98 66 a8 0b 9b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .6..f...........
> >     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> >   backtrace:
> >     [<0000000060e82407>] __kmalloc+0x2b4/0x340
> >     [<00000000dd99488f>] mempool_kmalloc+0x18/0x20
> >     [<000000002560172b>] mempool_init_node+0x98/0x118
> >     [<000000006c3574d2>] mempool_init+0x14/0x20
> >     [<0000000008cb266e>] verity_fec_ctr+0x388/0x3b0
> >     [<000000000887261b>] verity_ctr+0x87c/0x8d0
> >     [<000000002b1e1c62>] dm_table_add_target+0x174/0x348
> >     [<000000002ad89eda>] table_load+0xe4/0x328
> >     [<000000001f06f5e9>] dm_ctl_ioctl+0x3b4/0x5a0
> >     [<00000000bee5fbb7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5dc/0x928
> >     [<00000000b475b8f5>] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x70/0x98
> >     [<000000005361e2e8>] el0_svc_common+0xa0/0x158
> >     [<000000001374818f>] el0_svc_handler+0x6c/0x88
> >     [<000000003364e9f4>] el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> >     [<000000009d84cec9>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Harshini Shetty <harshini.x.shetty@xxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >  drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
> >index 3ceeb6b..49147e6 100644
> >--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
> >+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
> >@@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ void verity_fec_dtr(struct dm_verity *v)
> >  	mempool_exit(&f->rs_pool);
> >  	mempool_exit(&f->prealloc_pool);
> >  	mempool_exit(&f->extra_pool);
> >+	mempool_exit(&f->output_pool);
> >  	kmem_cache_destroy(f->cache);
> >  	if (f->data_bufio)
> 

For the benefit of others who might be reviewing:

Seems mempool_destroy() isn't being used because the mempools are members
of struct dm_verity_fec -- so those mempools will never be NULL.

Order of allocation is:
verity_ctr() calls verity_fec_ctr_alloc() to allocate v->fec
verity_parse_opt_arg() calls verity_fec_parse_opt_args() to allocate v->fec->dev
(from that point on verity_fec_is_enabled returnss true)
verity_ctr() calls verity_fec_ctr() which inits all mempools, etc.

destruction is:
verity_dtr() unconditionally calls verity_fec_dtr()
verity_fec_dtr() verifies v->fec->dev exists with verity_fec_is_enabled()

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux