[PATCH] dm-integrity: fix recalculation when moving from journal mode to bitmap mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we resume a device in bitmap mode and the on-disk format is in journal
mode, we must recalculate anything above ic->sb->recalc_sector. Otherwise,
there would be non-recalculated blocks causing I/O errors.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx	# v5.2+
Fixes: 468dfca38b1a ("dm integrity: add a bitmap mode")

---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c	2020-01-30 18:16:55.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c	2020-02-07 17:40:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -2899,17 +2899,20 @@ static void dm_integrity_resume(struct d
 	} else {
 		replay_journal(ic);
 		if (ic->mode == 'B') {
-			int mode;
 			ic->sb->flags |= cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_DIRTY_BITMAP);
 			ic->sb->log2_blocks_per_bitmap_bit = ic->log2_blocks_per_bitmap_bit;
 			r = sync_rw_sb(ic, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_FUA);
 			if (unlikely(r))
 				dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "writing superblock", r);
 
-			mode = ic->recalculate_flag ? BITMAP_OP_SET : BITMAP_OP_CLEAR;
-			block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->journal, 0, ic->provided_data_sectors, mode);
-			block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->recalc_bitmap, 0, ic->provided_data_sectors, mode);
-			block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->may_write_bitmap, 0, ic->provided_data_sectors, mode);
+			block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->journal, 0, ic->provided_data_sectors, BITMAP_OP_CLEAR);
+			block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->recalc_bitmap, 0, ic->provided_data_sectors, BITMAP_OP_CLEAR);
+			block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->may_write_bitmap, 0, ic->provided_data_sectors, BITMAP_OP_CLEAR);
+			if (ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_RECALCULATING) && le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector) < ic->provided_data_sectors) {
+				block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->journal, le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector), ic->provided_data_sectors - le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector), BITMAP_OP_SET);
+				block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->recalc_bitmap, le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector), ic->provided_data_sectors - le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector), BITMAP_OP_SET);
+				block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->may_write_bitmap, le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector), ic->provided_data_sectors - le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->recalc_sector), BITMAP_OP_SET);
+			}
 			rw_journal_sectors(ic, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_FUA | REQ_SYNC, 0,
 					   ic->n_bitmap_blocks * (BITMAP_BLOCK_SIZE >> SECTOR_SHIFT), NULL);
 		}

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux