Re: sched: make struct task_struct::state 32-bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> // FIXME: current not recognized as task_struct*, fixhack with regexp
> identifier current =~ "^current$";

Would you really like to use a regular expression for finding a single word?


> identifier state_var;
> position pos;
> @@
>
> (
>   p->state & state_var@pos
> |
>   current->state & state_var@pos
> |

I see further opportunities to make such a SmPL disjunction more succinct.

*
( ( \( p \| current \) ) -> state & state_var@pos
|
…

* How do you think about to work with a SmPL constraint
  for a metavariable with the type “binary operator”?


>   set_current_state(state_var@pos)
> |
>   set_special_state(state_var@pos)

| \( set_current_state \| set_special_state \) (state_var@pos)


> |
>   signal_pending_state(state_var@pos, p)
> |
>   signal_pending_state(state_var@pos, current)

| signal_pending_state(state_var@pos, \( p \| current \) )


Regards,
Markus

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux