Re: [PATCH v12 0/4] crypto: switch to crypto API for ESSIV generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/08/2019 10:18, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 10:29, Milan Broz <gmazyland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ard,
>>
>> On 15/08/2019 21:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Changes since v10:
>>> - Drop patches against fscrypt and dm-crypt - these will be routed via the
>>>   respective maintainer trees during the next cycle
>>
>> I tested the previous dm-crypt patches (I also try to keep them in my kernel.org tree),
>> it works and looks fine to me (and I like the final cleanup :)
>>
>> Once all maintainers are happy with the current state, I think it should go to
>> the next release (5.4; IMO both ESSIV API and dm-crypt changes).
>> Maybe you could keep sending dm-crypt patches in the end of the series (to help testing it)?
>>
> 
> OK. But we'll need to coordinate a bit so that the first patch (the
> one that introduces the template) is available in both branches,
> otherwise ESSIV will be broken in the dm branch until it hits another
> branch (-next or mainline) that also contains cryptodev.

Yes, I know. I'll ask Mike what is his preference here...
For now, it should appear at least in the cryptodev tree :)

...
 
> Any idea about the status of the EBOIV patch?

It is in the queue for 5.4 (should be in linux-next already), I guess 5.4 target is ok here.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-5.4

Milan

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux