Re: xts fuzz testing and lack of ciphertext stealing support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 04:35:26PM +0000, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> Tthen there's still the issue of advancing that last tweak. From what I've seen,
> the xts implementation does not output the last tweak so you would have to 
> recompute it locally in cts.c as block_cipher_enc(iv) * alpha^j. Which is wasteful.
> Of course this could be solved by redefining xts to output the last tweak
> like CBC/CTR output their last IV ... Which would probably give us HW guys
> trouble again because our HW cannot do *that* ... (While the HW very likely 
> *does* implement the cipher text stealing properly, just to be able to boast
> about IEEE P1619 compliance ...)

If your hardware supports XTS properly then you wouldn't even need
to use this new template.  You would directly export the xts
interface.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux