On 6/21/19 6:07 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index 95202f80676c..067ef9242275 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -284,13 +284,20 @@ enum req_opf {
REQ_OP_DISCARD = 3,
/* securely erase sectors */
REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE = 5,
- /* reset a zone write pointer */
- REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET = 6,
/* write the same sector many times */
REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME = 7,
/* write the zero filled sector many times */
REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES = 9,
+ /* reset a zone write pointer */
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET = 16,
+ /* Open zone(s) */
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN = 17,
+ /* Close zone(s) */
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE = 18,
+ /* Finish zone(s) */
+ REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH = 19,
+
/* SCSI passthrough using struct scsi_request */
REQ_OP_SCSI_IN = 32,
REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT = 33,
@@ -375,6 +382,22 @@ static inline void bio_set_op_attrs(struct bio *bio, unsigned op,
bio->bi_opf = op | op_flags;
}
Are the new operation types ever passed to op_is_write()? The definition
of that function is as follows:
static inline bool op_is_write(unsigned int op)
{
return (op & 1);
}
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
