On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:55:19AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23 2019 at 4:31am -0400,
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:27:45AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > > .../{atomic_bitops.txt => atomic_bitops.rst} | 2 +
> >
> > What's happend to atomic_t.txt, also NAK, I still occationally touch
> > these files.
>
> Seems Mauro's point is in the future we need to touch these .rst files
> in terms of ReST compatible changes.
>
> I'm dreading DM documentation changes in the future.. despite Mauro and
> Jon Corbet informing me that ReST is simple, etc.
Well, it _can_ be simple, I've seen examples of rst that were not far
from generated HTML contents. And I must give Jon credit for not
accepting that atrocious crap.
But yes, I have 0 motivation to learn or abide by rst. It simply doesn't
give me anything in return. There is no upside, only worse text files :/
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
