Re: [patch V2 21/29] tracing: Use percpu stack trace buffer more intelligently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:43:59 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:40 +0200
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ftrace_stack, ftrace_stack);
> > > +/* This allows 8 level nesting which is plenty */  
> > 
> > Can we make this 4 level nesting and increase the size? (I can see us
> > going more than 64 deep, kernel developers never cease to amaze me ;-)
> > That's all we need:
> > 
> >  Context: Normal, softirq, irq, NMI
> > 
> > Is there any other way to nest?  
> 
> Not that I know, but you are the tracer dude :)
>

There's other places I only test 4 deep, so it should be fine to limit
it to 4 then.

Thanks!

-- Steve

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux