Resending as plain text, apologies. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:23 PM John Dorminy <jdorminy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Adding dm-devel since it involves LVM. > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:14 PM Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> If the lvm is stacked by different logical_block_size disks, >> when WRITE SAME on it, will bug_on: >> >> kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/sd.c:968! >> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI >> CPU: 11 PID: 525 Comm: kworker/11:1H Tainted: G O 5.0.0-rc3+ #2 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-2.fc27 04/01/2014 >> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn >> RIP: 0010:sd_init_command+0x7aa/0xdb0 >> Code: 30 75 00 00 c7 85 44 01 00 00 18 00 00 00 0f 85 fa 04 00 00 48 83 c4 40 48 >> 89 df 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f e9 b6 ca fe ff <0f> 0b 41 bc 09 >> RSP: 0018:ffffb55f80ddbca0 EFLAGS: 00010206 >> RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: ffff9ed23fb927a0 RCX: 000000000000f000 >> RDX: ffff9ed23f0a8400 RSI: ffff9ed27bc79800 RDI: 0000000000000000 >> RBP: ffff9ed23fb92680 R08: ffff9ed27c8c0000 R09: ffff9ed23fb927d8 >> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff9ed27bc79800 >> R13: ffff9ed2787a0000 R14: ffff9ed27bdf3400 R15: ffff9ed23fb927a0 >> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ed27c8c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> CR2: 00007f6b14cf9341 CR3: 0000000069058000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 >> Call Trace: >> ? vp_notify+0x12/0x20 >> scsi_queue_rq+0x525/0xa30 >> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x8d/0x580 >> ? syscall_return_via_sysret+0x10/0x7f >> ? elv_rb_del+0x1f/0x30 >> ? deadline_remove_request+0x55/0xc0 >> blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x76/0x110 >> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xf9/0x170 >> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x51/0xd0 >> process_one_work+0x195/0x380 >> worker_thread+0x30/0x390 >> ? process_one_work+0x380/0x380 >> kthread+0x113/0x130 >> ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 >> ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 >> Modules linked in: alloc(O+) >> ---[ end trace dc92ddeb2e6d1fe5 ]--- >> >> The logical_block_size of the LVM is the max value of the sub disks, >> it maybe different with one of the sub disk. when WRITE SAME on the >> disk, it will BUG_ON when setup WRITE SAME cmd. >> >> Close WRITE_SAME feature on the LVM if it was stacked by different >> logical_block_size disk. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> block/blk-settings.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c >> index 3e7038e475ee..e1695155ad61 100644 >> --- a/block/blk-settings.c >> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c >> @@ -537,6 +537,10 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b, >> } >> } >> >> + /* If the logical block size is different, forbid write same */ >> + if (t->logical_block_size != b->logical_block_size) >> + t->max_write_same_sectors = 0; >> + >> t->logical_block_size = max(t->logical_block_size, >> b->logical_block_size); >> >> -- >> 2.14.4 >> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
