On Sun, 30 Dec 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:09:44AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > - Fix various DM targets to check for device sector overflow if > > CONFIG_LBDAF is not set. > > Question to Jens and Linus: > > is there any good reason to keep the CONFIG_LBDAF=n option around? > Less than 2gig block devices seem to be an absolutele niche, and I > wonder if it is still worth maintaining the special case just for that. The CONFIG_LBDAF limit is 2TiB, not 2GiB. But you're right that 2TiB devices are common and that perhaps this option should go away. Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
