On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:53:08PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > -
> > - if (page == bv->bv_page && off == bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len) {
> > - bv->bv_len += len;
> > - bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> > - return true;
> > - }
> > + struct request_queue *q = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (page == bv->bv_page && off == (bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len)
> > + && (off + len) <= PAGE_SIZE)
>
> How could the page struct be the same, but the range beyond PAGE_SIZE
> (at least with the existing callers)?
>
> Also no need for the inner btraces, and the && always goes on the
> first line.
OK.
>
> > + if (bio->bi_disk)
> > + q = bio->bi_disk->queue;
> > +
> > + /* disable multi-page bvec too if cluster isn't enabled */
> > + if (!q || !blk_queue_cluster(q) ||
> > + ((page_to_phys(bv->bv_page) + bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len) !=
> > + (page_to_phys(page) + off)))
> > + return false;
> > + merge:
> > + bv->bv_len += len;
> > + bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> > + return true;
>
> Ok, this is scary, as it will give differen results depending on when
> bi_disk is assigned.
It is just merge or not, both can be handled well now.
> But then again we shouldn't really do the cluster
> check here, but rather when splitting the bio for the actual low-level
> driver.
Yeah, I thought of this way too, but it may cause tons of bio split for
no-clustering, and there are quite a few scsi devices which require
to disable clustering.
[linux]$ git grep -n DISABLE_CLUSTERING ./drivers/scsi/ | wc -l
28
Or we may introduce bio_split_to_single_page_bvec() to allocate &
convert to single-page bvec table for non-clustering, will try this
approach in next version.
>
> (and eventually we should kill this clustering setting off in favor
> of our normal segment limits).
Yeah, it has been in my post-multi-page todo list already, :-)
thanks,
Ming
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
