On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 08:49 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 11/14/18 6:38 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > Not holding my breath BUT: > > if decoupling the reading of ANA state from native NVMe > > multipathing > > specific work during nvme request completion were an acceptable > > advancement I'd gladly do the work. > > > I'd be happy to work on that, given that we'll have to have 'real' > ANA > support for device-mapper anyway for SLE12 SP4 etc. So, what's the way ahead for multipath-tools? Given that, IIUC, at least one official kernel (4.19) has been released with ANA support but without the ANA sysfs attributes exported to user space, multipath-tools can't rely on them being present. I for one have no issue with copying code from nvme-cli and doing NVMe ioctls from multipath-tools, as in Lijie's patch. When those sysfs attributes are added (and work as expected), we will use them, but IMO we'll need to fall back to ioctls until then, and also afterwards, because we can't assume to be always running on the latest kernel. Best, Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
