Re: [patch 0/5] device mapper percpu patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 07 2018 at  5:29pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 06 2018 at  4:34pm -0500,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > 
> > These are the device mapper percpu patches.
> > 
> > Note that I didn't test request-based device mapper because I don't have
> > hardware for it (the patches don't convert request-base targets to percpu
> > values, but there are a few inevitable changes in dm-rq.c).
> 
> Patches 1 - 3 make sense.  But the use of percpu inflight counters isn't
> something I can get upstream.  Any more scalable counter still needs to
> be wired up to the block stats interfaces (the one you did in patch 5 is
> only for the "inflight" fsffs file, there is also the generic diskstats
> callout to part_in_flight(), etc).  Wiring up both part_in_flight() and
> part_in_flight_rw() to optionally callout to a new callback isn't going
> to fly.. especially if that callout is looping up the sum of percpu
> counters.
> 
> I checked with Jens and now that in 4.21 all of the old request-based IO
> path is gone (and given that blk-mq bypasses use of ->in_flight[]): the
> only consumer of the existing ->in_flight[] is the bio-based IO path.
> 
> Given that now only bio-based is consuming it, and your work was focused
> on making bio-based DM's "pending" IO accounting more scalable, it is
> best to just change block core's ->in_flight[] directly.
> 
> But Jens is against switching to using percpu counters because they are
> really slow when summing the counts.  And diskstats does that
> frequently.  Jens said at least 2 other attempts were made and rejected
> to switch over to percpu counters.
> 
> Jens' suggestion is to implement a new generic rolling per-node
> counter.  Would you be open to trying that?

I've based my dm-4.21 branch on Jens' for-4.21/block branch and staged
your first 3 patches.  If you're interested in exploring rolling
per-node inflight counters please base your work on this branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-4.21

("rolling per-node counters" aside, any new DM development should be
based on the dm-4.21 branch)

Mike

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux