Re: LUKS2 - RAID0 - NVME : alignment issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, laurent cop wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have trouble while in top of the stack :
> mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/raid0luks2
> /dev/mapper/raid0luks2 alignement is offset by 147456 bytes
> This may result in very poor performance (re-) partitioning is suggested.
> I have the same pb with mkfs.xfs

Just ignore this warning. dm-integrity interleaves data and metadata and 
consequently data are not aligned on raid stripe boundary.

> I am using following scheme:
> 
> LUKS2           => created with cryptsetup -v luksFormat --type luks2 /dev/md127 --cipher aes-gcm-random --integrity aeae
> RAID 0           => created with mdadm chunk=32
> 3 Disks NVME => partition with gdisk (fist sector : 2048)
> 
> I got this information with lsblk -t for each 3 disks, i got the same information.
> nvmeXn1
>        -> NvmeXn1p1                                 ALIGN = 0
>                   -> md127                               ALIGN = 0
>                            -> raid0luks2_dif           ALIGN = 147456
>                                        -> raid0luks2     ALIGN = 147456
> 1) How can I solve my alignment issue?
>
> 2) Is it normal to have low performances while writing with dd. I was 
> using LUKS previously and I got only one dev mapper. Now I got 2. Does 
> it have a big impact on performances?
> 
> Kind regards.

dm-integrity already slows down writes about 3 times. At this situation, 
trying to align accesses to raid stripe size doesn't make much sense.

If you want to improve performance, you may try to put two dm-ingerity 
images directly on the SSDs and create raid-0 on the top of them. It may 
perform better, but you'll have to benchmark it with the workload you are 
optimizing for.

Mikulas
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux