On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 22:09 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > > I like the lock removal a lot, but not so much the conversion into a > string. Why not keep the dev_t? > > Or maybe even easier, the other way around: why don't we make it a > char* and simply set checker->dev_t = &pp->dev_t? OK, that 2nd one won't work because pp may be destroyed before the checker terminates. Got it. Still I'd prefer keeping a dev_t in the checker structure rather than a char[32]. Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
