Yes, the compiler is right to warn about a meaningless 'const' return by
value.
Acked-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 09/17/2018 10:02 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
With gcc-4.1.2:
drivers/md/dm-raid.c:3357: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
Remove the "const" keyword to fix this.
Fixes: 36a240a706d43383 ("dm raid: fix RAID leg rebuild errors")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index 5ba067fa0c729bc8..c44925e4e4813d24 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ static const char *sync_str(enum sync_state state)
};
/* Return enum sync_state for @mddev derived from @recovery flags */
-static const enum sync_state decipher_sync_action(struct mddev *mddev, unsigned long recovery)
+static enum sync_state decipher_sync_action(struct mddev *mddev, unsigned long recovery)
{
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &recovery))
return st_frozen;
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
