Hi Ondrej,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:28:41PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>
> -static int init_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, crypto_completion_t done)
> +static int xor_tweak_pre(struct skcipher_request *req)
> {
> - struct priv *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req));
> - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
> - struct skcipher_request *subreq;
> - gfp_t gfp;
> -
> - subreq = &rctx->subreq;
> - skcipher_request_set_tfm(subreq, ctx->child);
> - skcipher_request_set_callback(subreq, req->base.flags, done, req);
> -
> - gfp = req->base.flags & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP ? GFP_KERNEL :
> - GFP_ATOMIC;
> - rctx->ext = NULL;
> -
> - subreq->cryptlen = XTS_BUFFER_SIZE;
> - if (req->cryptlen > XTS_BUFFER_SIZE) {
> - unsigned int n = min(req->cryptlen, (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE);
> -
> - rctx->ext = kmalloc(n, gfp);
> - if (rctx->ext)
> - subreq->cryptlen = n;
> - }
> -
> - rctx->src = req->src;
> - rctx->dst = req->dst;
> - rctx->left = req->cryptlen;
> -
> - /* calculate first value of T */
> - crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ctx->tweak, (u8 *)&rctx->t, req->iv);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return xor_tweak(req, false);
> }
>
> -static void exit_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req)
> +static int xor_tweak_post(struct skcipher_request *req)
> {
> - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
> -
> - rctx->left = 0;
> -
> - if (rctx->ext)
> - kzfree(rctx->ext);
> + return xor_tweak(req, false);
> }
I think you meant 'xor_tweak(req, true);' here?
> +static void crypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
> {
> struct skcipher_request *req = areq->data;
> - struct skcipher_request *subreq;
> - struct rctx *rctx;
> -
> - rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
> -
> - if (err == -EINPROGRESS) {
> - if (rctx->left != req->cryptlen)
> - return;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - subreq = &rctx->subreq;
> - subreq->base.flags &= CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG;
>
> - err = do_encrypt(req, err ?: post_crypt(req));
> - if (rctx->left)
> - return;
> + if (!err)
> + err = xor_tweak(req, true);
Use xor_tweak_post()?
Note that you could also change the bool to
enum {
FIRST_PASS,
SECOND_PASS,
}
if you find the bool to be unclear.
Thanks,
- Eric
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
