On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 04:39:23PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > 1. don't set CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP in dm-crypt > ================================================= > If we don't set it, dm-crypt will use GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_ATOMIC may fail. > The function init_crypt in xts.c handles the failure gracefully - but the > question is - does the whole crypto code handle allocation failures > gracefully? If not and if it returns -ENOMEM somewhere, it would result in > I/O errors and data corruption. It is safe to use GFP_ATOMIC. First of the allocation is really small (less than a page) so it will only fail when the system is almost completely out of memory. Even when it does fail the crypto operation will still succeed, albeit it will process things at a smaller granularity so the performance will degrade. The sleeping part of that flag is also not an issue because it only kicks in once per page. As this is going to be less than or equal to a page it shouldn't matter. > 3. introduce new flag CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP_NOIO > =================================================== > Would you like to introduce it? For now I don't think this is necessary given that this allocation and similar ones in lrw and other places in the crypto API are just performance enhancements and unlikely to fail except in very dire situations. But if new problems arise I'm certainly not opposed to this. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
