[PATCH v3 5/6] md/dm-writecache: Don't request pointer dummy_addr when not required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@xxxxxxxxxx>

Function persistent_memory_claim doesn't need to get local pointer
dummy_addr from direct_access. Using NULL instead of having to pass
in a useless local pointer that caller then just throw away.

Suggested-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
index 87107c9..9d79084 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
@@ -268,9 +268,8 @@ static int persistent_memory_claim(struct dm_writecache *wc)
 		i = 0;
 		do {
 			long daa;
-			void *dummy_addr;
 			daa = dax_direct_access(wc->ssd_dev->dax_dev, i, p - i,
-						&dummy_addr, &pfn);
+						NULL, &pfn);
 			if (daa <= 0) {
 				r = daa ? daa : -EINVAL;
 				goto err3;
-- 
1.8.3.1


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux