From: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@xxxxxxxxxx> pmem_direct_access() needs to check the validity of pointers kaddr and pfn for NULL assignment. If anyone equals to NULL, it doesn't need to calculate the value. If pointer equals to NULL, that is to say callers may have no need for kaddr or pfn, so this patch is prepared for allowing them to pass in NULL instead of having to pass in a pointer or local variable that they then just throw away. Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c index 8b1fd7f..ecf9024 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c @@ -227,8 +227,11 @@ __weak long __pmem_direct_access(struct pmem_device *pmem, pgoff_t pgoff, if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512, PFN_PHYS(nr_pages)))) return -EIO; - *kaddr = pmem->virt_addr + offset; - *pfn = phys_to_pfn_t(pmem->phys_addr + offset, pmem->pfn_flags); + + if (kaddr) + *kaddr = pmem->virt_addr + offset; + if (pfn) + *pfn = phys_to_pfn_t(pmem->phys_addr + offset, pmem->pfn_flags); /* * If badblocks are present, limit known good range to the -- 1.8.3.1 -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
